Relaxing for one second in Child’s Pose provides your mind and muscles a chances to holiday the retreat madness.
How-to: Sit coming back on heels surrounded by the insides of legs and feet touching. Lean forward, bowing torso for the duration of thighs and deduction forehead to mat. Extend arms forward, palms down. Relax to pose, widening knees or bending elbows a bit, as desired. Focus on breathing, producing 4-8 counts for every inhale and exhale, and relaxing deeper to pose amid every exhale.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Study: 4 Out of 5 Doctors Don’t Get Enough Exercise
As a well being writer, homeowners often ask me if I’ve will be my lifestyle to become a healthier person. Do I eat healthier, struggle out more, and in effect put to use any of individuals nifty hints I decide something like each day?
For a for a while now time, my response was, “No-I nonetheless undergo all the same bad habits; now I easily feel guiltier in regards to them.”
I did fast get engaged in fitness and running, partially thanks to my job. But I much come across it hard to squeeze in a workout multiple days, nonetheless even though I appreciate how vital it is to my ongoing health.
Turns out, I’m possibly not the merely health-related expert who feels who way. Most doctors, who recognize the dangers of idling a greater number of as opposed to anyone, don’t get a sufficient amount of exercise, according to a news story published presently period in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Almost 80% of doctors collapse short
Researchers at the United Kingdom’s Bedford Hospital NHS Trust questioned 61 hospital physicians and at last found overly easily 21% get the recommended 30 seconds of cynical exercise at the very least 5 days a week-that’s dwindled as opposed to side of the 44% of the general populace in the same age team who argue to balance such goal. Those who didn’t blamed lack of time, lack of motivation, or lack of workout facilities. (Doctors in an on-site gym at such a hospital didn’t fare any right as opposed to folks without, however. In fact, a third of them didn’t much recognize it existed!)
Other desired habits had seemed to rub off on the junior doctors, who had an normal age of 27 and an typical BMI of 23.5 (considered average weight): They weighed diminished and smoked ebbed as opposed to the countrywide average, and easily 7% drank a greater number of as opposed to the recommended weekly level of alcohol. As for this abysmal exercise habits, different had continued !no! active in school-and had one and only become couch potatoes in the wake of properties began such a jobs.
What performs it hint for us?
While the prediction was carried out on British hospital doctors (as opposed to, say, American primary-care physicians), coauthor Lampson Fan, MBBS, is going to bet such a findings can be similar elsewhere: “In both the U.K. and U.S., doctors are short of the lower of the same stresses,” he says. “In most ways, it’s more than likely worse in the U.S. as the doctors there are endeavoring on usual 30 hours a greater amount of [a week] as opposed to persons in the U.K.”
While I can’t say I’m shocked at these kinds of results, the rates are rather disheartening. If doctors, whose responsibility it could be to promote magnificent health, can’t take in bit to exercise, how wish is there for others out there investing in demanding schedules-lawyers, truck drivers, attempting moms, or households who suffer taken on a minute job?
Previous examination has substantiated so doctors who exercise are supplementary innate to counsel this patients to do the same, and such a patients are funny things going to try exercising when such a doctors disclose the own customized workout habits. Think close to it: If an out-of-shape doctor pleaded investing in you to get a greater amount of exercise, how monumentally ought to you take him appreciating the he’s not buying sufficient himself?
Dr. Lampson recommends who health-care experts do a larger number of to promote physical activity with employees, these types of as sponsoring organized exercise classes, council sports, and discounts amidst local gyms. If doctors can get passionate virtually exercise, hopefully they’ll pass on so excitement to this patients-or at lowest set a top notch example.
Does the physical fitness of your doctor question to you? Have you as of yet carried on motivated-or discouraged-by the well being of a physician?
For a for a while now time, my response was, “No-I nonetheless undergo all the same bad habits; now I easily feel guiltier in regards to them.”
I did fast get engaged in fitness and running, partially thanks to my job. But I much come across it hard to squeeze in a workout multiple days, nonetheless even though I appreciate how vital it is to my ongoing health.
Turns out, I’m possibly not the merely health-related expert who feels who way. Most doctors, who recognize the dangers of idling a greater number of as opposed to anyone, don’t get a sufficient amount of exercise, according to a news story published presently period in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Almost 80% of doctors collapse short
Researchers at the United Kingdom’s Bedford Hospital NHS Trust questioned 61 hospital physicians and at last found overly easily 21% get the recommended 30 seconds of cynical exercise at the very least 5 days a week-that’s dwindled as opposed to side of the 44% of the general populace in the same age team who argue to balance such goal. Those who didn’t blamed lack of time, lack of motivation, or lack of workout facilities. (Doctors in an on-site gym at such a hospital didn’t fare any right as opposed to folks without, however. In fact, a third of them didn’t much recognize it existed!)
Other desired habits had seemed to rub off on the junior doctors, who had an normal age of 27 and an typical BMI of 23.5 (considered average weight): They weighed diminished and smoked ebbed as opposed to the countrywide average, and easily 7% drank a greater number of as opposed to the recommended weekly level of alcohol. As for this abysmal exercise habits, different had continued !no! active in school-and had one and only become couch potatoes in the wake of properties began such a jobs.
What performs it hint for us?
While the prediction was carried out on British hospital doctors (as opposed to, say, American primary-care physicians), coauthor Lampson Fan, MBBS, is going to bet such a findings can be similar elsewhere: “In both the U.K. and U.S., doctors are short of the lower of the same stresses,” he says. “In most ways, it’s more than likely worse in the U.S. as the doctors there are endeavoring on usual 30 hours a greater amount of [a week] as opposed to persons in the U.K.”
While I can’t say I’m shocked at these kinds of results, the rates are rather disheartening. If doctors, whose responsibility it could be to promote magnificent health, can’t take in bit to exercise, how wish is there for others out there investing in demanding schedules-lawyers, truck drivers, attempting moms, or households who suffer taken on a minute job?
Previous examination has substantiated so doctors who exercise are supplementary innate to counsel this patients to do the same, and such a patients are funny things going to try exercising when such a doctors disclose the own customized workout habits. Think close to it: If an out-of-shape doctor pleaded investing in you to get a greater amount of exercise, how monumentally ought to you take him appreciating the he’s not buying sufficient himself?
Dr. Lampson recommends who health-care experts do a larger number of to promote physical activity with employees, these types of as sponsoring organized exercise classes, council sports, and discounts amidst local gyms. If doctors can get passionate virtually exercise, hopefully they’ll pass on so excitement to this patients-or at lowest set a top notch example.
Does the physical fitness of your doctor question to you? Have you as of yet carried on motivated-or discouraged-by the well being of a physician?
Exercise an Hour a Day? Here’s How to Make It Painless
You may experience heard the shock overly women fancy to exercise an hour a day, uni days a week to remain post-diet weight detriment out of popping back. And you may own kept on tempted-like I was-to mentally file it short of Super Depressing Health News That Must Be Ignored.
Who has long period of time for uni hours of exercise a week? The the most recent recommendation is 30 moments a day, one days a week, and I don’t continuing to get finishing to that. If you own kids, a job, or a life, an hour of daily exercise can appear as if a luxury reserved for tennis-playing socialites.
So I talked to the make researcher, John Jakicic, PhD, chair of the department of quality of life and physical activity at the University of Pittsburgh, to get a fact check.
You don’t hold to run a marathon
In the Archives of Internal Medicine study, Jakicic and his colleagues put 201 women (all overweight or obese, and aged 21 to 45) on a 1,200-1,500 calorie-a-day diet and one of five exercise regimens.
The women lost 8%-10% of this person weight in six months, regardless of the assembly properties got in. Most of them gained it returning by the end of the two-year study.
But the researchers took a glass-half-full system and zeroed in on the weight expense “success stories”-the 25% of women who did manage to remain the weight off.
They at last found these kinds of women got exercising more-about 275 seconds per week, or almost one hour four times a week-than the weight gainers.
The desired shocker is the current properties weren’t training for a triathlon.
“When I terminology virtually exercise or physical activity, I’m not operating almost forecasted to the gym-95% of these kinds of women didn’t go to the gym,” he informs me. “These customers basically, a large amount of of the time, elected to go out for a walk. And so walk can be as very brief as 10 moments at a time.”
It all sounds great. But really-how did properties do it? I am sure significantly 10 cost free moments will be feisty to submit on particularlly days.
Sweating not necessary
Turns out the women squeezed exercise to super-packed schedules, claims Jakicic. The women had once-a-week committe meetings in that properties talked providing the peers nearly this diet and exercise problems. And the commission offered solutions.
“We’re not speaking up grim fluxes here, we’re speaking regarding small situations the current fashion a difference,” states Jakicic. “We hear now all the time: ‘I consistently suffer to take my kids to a soccer game and I suffer to be there an hour and a side and all I do is sit.’ Well, [I inform them to] get up off the bleachers and walk everywhere the soccer field and all the sudden the indistinct goes on and properties go, ‘Yeah.’ It s virtually as if it’s so clear properties couldn’t guess of it on this own.”
Apparently, sweating isn’t necessary.
“Instead of willing for portion an hour and simply sitting there and eating on your lunch break, go outside and take a walk for 10 seconds and later arrive returning and hold your lunch,” he said. “Absolutely you can do right now and not sweat. It instigates a big change for people.”
Jakicic supports too you do undergo to difference your diet to waste the weight in the previous place. And as we all know, cutting out the cake isn’t a cakewalk.
But the one and only occurence worse as opposed to going through to diet to consume weight, is to own to do it again. It’s an adequate amount of to get you moving.
Who has long period of time for uni hours of exercise a week? The the most recent recommendation is 30 moments a day, one days a week, and I don’t continuing to get finishing to that. If you own kids, a job, or a life, an hour of daily exercise can appear as if a luxury reserved for tennis-playing socialites.
So I talked to the make researcher, John Jakicic, PhD, chair of the department of quality of life and physical activity at the University of Pittsburgh, to get a fact check.
You don’t hold to run a marathon
In the Archives of Internal Medicine study, Jakicic and his colleagues put 201 women (all overweight or obese, and aged 21 to 45) on a 1,200-1,500 calorie-a-day diet and one of five exercise regimens.
The women lost 8%-10% of this person weight in six months, regardless of the assembly properties got in. Most of them gained it returning by the end of the two-year study.
But the researchers took a glass-half-full system and zeroed in on the weight expense “success stories”-the 25% of women who did manage to remain the weight off.
They at last found these kinds of women got exercising more-about 275 seconds per week, or almost one hour four times a week-than the weight gainers.
The desired shocker is the current properties weren’t training for a triathlon.
“When I terminology virtually exercise or physical activity, I’m not operating almost forecasted to the gym-95% of these kinds of women didn’t go to the gym,” he informs me. “These customers basically, a large amount of of the time, elected to go out for a walk. And so walk can be as very brief as 10 moments at a time.”
It all sounds great. But really-how did properties do it? I am sure significantly 10 cost free moments will be feisty to submit on particularlly days.
Sweating not necessary
Turns out the women squeezed exercise to super-packed schedules, claims Jakicic. The women had once-a-week committe meetings in that properties talked providing the peers nearly this diet and exercise problems. And the commission offered solutions.
“We’re not speaking up grim fluxes here, we’re speaking regarding small situations the current fashion a difference,” states Jakicic. “We hear now all the time: ‘I consistently suffer to take my kids to a soccer game and I suffer to be there an hour and a side and all I do is sit.’ Well, [I inform them to] get up off the bleachers and walk everywhere the soccer field and all the sudden the indistinct goes on and properties go, ‘Yeah.’ It s virtually as if it’s so clear properties couldn’t guess of it on this own.”
Apparently, sweating isn’t necessary.
“Instead of willing for portion an hour and simply sitting there and eating on your lunch break, go outside and take a walk for 10 seconds and later arrive returning and hold your lunch,” he said. “Absolutely you can do right now and not sweat. It instigates a big change for people.”
Jakicic supports too you do undergo to difference your diet to waste the weight in the previous place. And as we all know, cutting out the cake isn’t a cakewalk.
But the one and only occurence worse as opposed to going through to diet to consume weight, is to own to do it again. It’s an adequate amount of to get you moving.
Rumsfeld nemesis Shinseki to be named VA secretary
WASHINGTON - President-elect Barack Obama has chosen retired Gen. Eric K. Shinseki to be the next Veterans Affairs secretary, turning to a former Army chief of staff once vilified by the Bush administration for questioning its Iraq war strategy.
Obama will announce the selection of Shinseki, the first Army four-star general of Japanese-American ancestry, at a news conference Sunday in Chicago. He will be the first Asian-American to hold the post of Veterans Affairs secretary, adding to the growing diversity of Obama’s Cabinet.
“I think that General Shinseki is exactly the right person who is going to be able to make sure that we honor our troops when they come home,” Obama said in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” to be broadcast Sunday.
NBC released a transcript of the interview after The Associated Press reported that Shinseki was Obama’s pick.
Shinseki’s tenure as Army chief of staff from 1999 to 2003 was marked by constant tensions with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, which boiled over in 2003 when Shinseki testified to Congress that it might take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to control Iraq after the invasion.
Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, belittled the estimate as “wildly off the mark” and the army general was ousted within months. But Shinseki’s words proved prophetic after President George W. Bush in early 2007 announced a “surge” of additional troops to Iraq after miscalculating the numbers needed to stem sectarian violence.
Obama said he chose Shinseki for the VA post because he “was right” in predicting that the U.S. will need more troops in Iraq than Rumsfeld believed at the time.
“When I reflect on the sacrifices that have been made by our veterans and I think about how so many veterans around the country are struggling even more than those who have not served - higher unemployment rates, higher homeless rates, higher substance abuse rates, medical care that is inadequate - it breaks my heart,” Obama told NBC.
Shinseki, 66, is slated to take the helm of the government’s second largest agency, which was roundly criticized during the Bush administration for underestimating the amount of funding needed to treat thousands of injured veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Thousands of veterans currently endure six-month waits for disability benefits, despite promises by current VA Secretary James Peake and his predecessor, Jim Nicholson, to reduce delays. The department also is scrambling to upgrade government technology systems before new legislation providing for millions of dollars in new GI benefits takes effect next August.
Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, praised Shinseki as a “great choice” who will make an excellent VA secretary.
“I have great respect for General Shinseki’s judgment and abilities,” Akaka said in a statement. “I am confident that he will use his wisdom and experience to ensure that our veterans receive the respect and care they have earned in defense of our nation. President-elect Obama is selecting a team that reflects our nation’s greatest strength, its diversity, and I applaud him.”
Veterans groups also cheered the decision.
“General Shinseki has a record of courage and honesty, and is a bold choice to lead the VA into the future,” said Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. “He is a man that has always put patriotism ahead of politics, and is held in high regard by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.”
Obama’s choice of Shinseki, who grew up in Hawaii, is the latest indication that the president-elect is making good on his pledge to have a diverse Cabinet.
In Obama’s eight Cabinet announcements so far, white men are the minority with two nominations - Timothy Geithner at Treasury and Robert Gates at Defense. Three are women - Janet Napolitano at Homeland Security, Susan Rice as United Nations ambassador and Hillary Rodham Clinton at State. Eric Holder at the Justice Department is African American, while Bill Richardson at Commerce is Latino.
Shinseki is a recipient of two Purple Hearts for life-threatening injuries in Vietnam.
Upon leaving his post in June 2003, Shinseki in his farewell speech sternly warned against arrogance in leadership.
“You must love those you lead before you can be an effective leader,” he said. “You can certainly command without that sense of commitment, but you cannot lead without it. And without leadership, command is a hollow experience, a vacuum often filled with mistrust and arrogance.”
Obama will announce the selection of Shinseki, the first Army four-star general of Japanese-American ancestry, at a news conference Sunday in Chicago. He will be the first Asian-American to hold the post of Veterans Affairs secretary, adding to the growing diversity of Obama’s Cabinet.
“I think that General Shinseki is exactly the right person who is going to be able to make sure that we honor our troops when they come home,” Obama said in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” to be broadcast Sunday.
NBC released a transcript of the interview after The Associated Press reported that Shinseki was Obama’s pick.
Shinseki’s tenure as Army chief of staff from 1999 to 2003 was marked by constant tensions with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, which boiled over in 2003 when Shinseki testified to Congress that it might take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to control Iraq after the invasion.
Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, belittled the estimate as “wildly off the mark” and the army general was ousted within months. But Shinseki’s words proved prophetic after President George W. Bush in early 2007 announced a “surge” of additional troops to Iraq after miscalculating the numbers needed to stem sectarian violence.
Obama said he chose Shinseki for the VA post because he “was right” in predicting that the U.S. will need more troops in Iraq than Rumsfeld believed at the time.
“When I reflect on the sacrifices that have been made by our veterans and I think about how so many veterans around the country are struggling even more than those who have not served - higher unemployment rates, higher homeless rates, higher substance abuse rates, medical care that is inadequate - it breaks my heart,” Obama told NBC.
Shinseki, 66, is slated to take the helm of the government’s second largest agency, which was roundly criticized during the Bush administration for underestimating the amount of funding needed to treat thousands of injured veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Thousands of veterans currently endure six-month waits for disability benefits, despite promises by current VA Secretary James Peake and his predecessor, Jim Nicholson, to reduce delays. The department also is scrambling to upgrade government technology systems before new legislation providing for millions of dollars in new GI benefits takes effect next August.
Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, praised Shinseki as a “great choice” who will make an excellent VA secretary.
“I have great respect for General Shinseki’s judgment and abilities,” Akaka said in a statement. “I am confident that he will use his wisdom and experience to ensure that our veterans receive the respect and care they have earned in defense of our nation. President-elect Obama is selecting a team that reflects our nation’s greatest strength, its diversity, and I applaud him.”
Veterans groups also cheered the decision.
“General Shinseki has a record of courage and honesty, and is a bold choice to lead the VA into the future,” said Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. “He is a man that has always put patriotism ahead of politics, and is held in high regard by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.”
Obama’s choice of Shinseki, who grew up in Hawaii, is the latest indication that the president-elect is making good on his pledge to have a diverse Cabinet.
In Obama’s eight Cabinet announcements so far, white men are the minority with two nominations - Timothy Geithner at Treasury and Robert Gates at Defense. Three are women - Janet Napolitano at Homeland Security, Susan Rice as United Nations ambassador and Hillary Rodham Clinton at State. Eric Holder at the Justice Department is African American, while Bill Richardson at Commerce is Latino.
Shinseki is a recipient of two Purple Hearts for life-threatening injuries in Vietnam.
Upon leaving his post in June 2003, Shinseki in his farewell speech sternly warned against arrogance in leadership.
“You must love those you lead before you can be an effective leader,” he said. “You can certainly command without that sense of commitment, but you cannot lead without it. And without leadership, command is a hollow experience, a vacuum often filled with mistrust and arrogance.”
Is Einstein the Last Great Genius?
Major breakthroughs in science have historically been the province of individuals, not institutes. Galileo and Copernicus, Edison and Einstein, toiling away in lonely labs or pondering the cosmos in private studies.
But in recent decades - especially since the Soviet success in launching the Sputnik satellite in 1957 - the trend has been to create massive institutions that foster more collaboration and garner big chunks of funding.
And it is harder now to achieve scientific greatness. A study of Nobel Prize winners in 2005 found that the accumulation of knowledge over time has forced great minds to toil longer before they can make breakthroughs. The age at which thinkers produce significant innovations increased about six years during the 20th century.
Don’t count the individual genius out just yet, however.
A balance between individual and institutional approaches is the best idea, according to a new theory by a Duke University engineer Adrian Bejan, who thinks institutions benefit most from the co-existence of large groups that self-organize naturally and lone scientists coming up with brilliant new ideas.
“The history of scientific achievement is marked by solitary investigators, from Archimedes to Newton to Darwin,” Bejan points out in the December issue of the International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. “Solitary thinkers have flourished throughout history because it is natural - science is good for the mind of the thinker and for the well-being of society. Even though the trend is toward the creation of large research groups, the individual will always flourish.”
Yet the very notion of individual genius is somewhat overrated, as even some of the geniuses will attest.
Sir Isaac Newton, for example, said that if he had achieved anything with his work, such as his laws of motion and gravity, it was “by standing on the shoulders of giants.”
Soviet pressure
The course of modern research changed abruptly after Oct. 4, 1957, when the former Soviet Union became the first nation in space by launching Sputnik, Bejan said. That fueled a dramatic increase in U.S. funding of large research groups within institutions already known for their research, he says. This model was adopted by smaller institutions, which also began forming larger groups to attract funding.
However, individual big thinkers didn’t disappear. Bejan argues they continued to thrive. He thinks his “constructal theory,” which he began describing in 1996, might explain why.
The theory states that so-called flow systems evolve to balance and minimize imperfections, reducing friction or other forms of resistance, so that the least amount of useful energy is lost. Examples in nature include rivers and streams that make up a delta or the intricate airways of the lungs.
In research done by humans, Bejan sees two main flows: those of ideas in the form of scientific findings, and those of support, measured by tangible factors such as funding and lab space.
“Successful research groups are those that grow and evolve on their own over time,” he says. “For example, an individual comes up with a good idea, gets funding, and new group begins to form around that good idea. This creates a framework where many smaller groups contribute to the whole.”
But in recent decades - especially since the Soviet success in launching the Sputnik satellite in 1957 - the trend has been to create massive institutions that foster more collaboration and garner big chunks of funding.
And it is harder now to achieve scientific greatness. A study of Nobel Prize winners in 2005 found that the accumulation of knowledge over time has forced great minds to toil longer before they can make breakthroughs. The age at which thinkers produce significant innovations increased about six years during the 20th century.
Don’t count the individual genius out just yet, however.
A balance between individual and institutional approaches is the best idea, according to a new theory by a Duke University engineer Adrian Bejan, who thinks institutions benefit most from the co-existence of large groups that self-organize naturally and lone scientists coming up with brilliant new ideas.
“The history of scientific achievement is marked by solitary investigators, from Archimedes to Newton to Darwin,” Bejan points out in the December issue of the International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics. “Solitary thinkers have flourished throughout history because it is natural - science is good for the mind of the thinker and for the well-being of society. Even though the trend is toward the creation of large research groups, the individual will always flourish.”
Yet the very notion of individual genius is somewhat overrated, as even some of the geniuses will attest.
Sir Isaac Newton, for example, said that if he had achieved anything with his work, such as his laws of motion and gravity, it was “by standing on the shoulders of giants.”
Soviet pressure
The course of modern research changed abruptly after Oct. 4, 1957, when the former Soviet Union became the first nation in space by launching Sputnik, Bejan said. That fueled a dramatic increase in U.S. funding of large research groups within institutions already known for their research, he says. This model was adopted by smaller institutions, which also began forming larger groups to attract funding.
However, individual big thinkers didn’t disappear. Bejan argues they continued to thrive. He thinks his “constructal theory,” which he began describing in 1996, might explain why.
The theory states that so-called flow systems evolve to balance and minimize imperfections, reducing friction or other forms of resistance, so that the least amount of useful energy is lost. Examples in nature include rivers and streams that make up a delta or the intricate airways of the lungs.
In research done by humans, Bejan sees two main flows: those of ideas in the form of scientific findings, and those of support, measured by tangible factors such as funding and lab space.
“Successful research groups are those that grow and evolve on their own over time,” he says. “For example, an individual comes up with a good idea, gets funding, and new group begins to form around that good idea. This creates a framework where many smaller groups contribute to the whole.”
My Three Sons’ actress Beverly Garland dies at 82
LOS ANGELES - Beverly Garland, the B-movie actress who starred in 1950s’ cult hits like “Swamp Women” and “Not of This Earth” and who went on to play Fred MacMurray’s TV wife on “My Three Sons,” has died. She was 82.
Garland died Friday at her Hollywood Hills home after a lengthy illness, her son-in-law Packy Smith told the Los Angeles Times.
Garland made her film debut in the 1950 noir classic “D.O.A.,” launching a 50-year career that included 40 movies and dozens of television shows.
She gained cult status for playing gutsy women in low-budget exploitation films such as “The Alligator People” and a number of Roger Corman movies including “Gunslinger,” “It Conquered the World” and “Naked Paradise.”
“I never considered myself very much of a passive kind of actress,” she said in a 1985 interview with Fangoria magazine. “I was never very comfortable in love scenes, never comfortable playing a sweet, lovable lady.”
Garland showed her comedic chops as Bing Crosby’s wife in the short-lived sitcom “The Bing Crosby Show” in the mid-’60s.
She went on to be cast in “My Three Sons” as the second wife of MacMurray’s widower Steve Douglas during the last three seasons of the popular series that aired from 1960 to 1972.
Her television credits also include “Remington Steele,” “Scarecrow and Mrs. King,” “Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,” “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman” and “7th Heaven.”
Garland was born Beverly Fessenden in Santa Cruz, Calif., in 1926, and grew up in Glendale. She became Beverly Garland when she married actor Richard Garland. They were divorced in 1953 after less than four years of marriage.
In 1960, she married real estate developer Fillmore Crank, and the couple built a mission-style hotel in North Hollywood, now called Beverly Garland’s Holiday Inn. Garland, whose husband died in 1999, remained involved in running the North Hollywood hotel.
She was the honorary mayor of North Hollywood and served on the boards of the California Tourism Corp. and the Greater Los Angeles Visitors and Convention Bureau.
Garland died Friday at her Hollywood Hills home after a lengthy illness, her son-in-law Packy Smith told the Los Angeles Times.
Garland made her film debut in the 1950 noir classic “D.O.A.,” launching a 50-year career that included 40 movies and dozens of television shows.
She gained cult status for playing gutsy women in low-budget exploitation films such as “The Alligator People” and a number of Roger Corman movies including “Gunslinger,” “It Conquered the World” and “Naked Paradise.”
“I never considered myself very much of a passive kind of actress,” she said in a 1985 interview with Fangoria magazine. “I was never very comfortable in love scenes, never comfortable playing a sweet, lovable lady.”
Garland showed her comedic chops as Bing Crosby’s wife in the short-lived sitcom “The Bing Crosby Show” in the mid-’60s.
She went on to be cast in “My Three Sons” as the second wife of MacMurray’s widower Steve Douglas during the last three seasons of the popular series that aired from 1960 to 1972.
Her television credits also include “Remington Steele,” “Scarecrow and Mrs. King,” “Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,” “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman” and “7th Heaven.”
Garland was born Beverly Fessenden in Santa Cruz, Calif., in 1926, and grew up in Glendale. She became Beverly Garland when she married actor Richard Garland. They were divorced in 1953 after less than four years of marriage.
In 1960, she married real estate developer Fillmore Crank, and the couple built a mission-style hotel in North Hollywood, now called Beverly Garland’s Holiday Inn. Garland, whose husband died in 1999, remained involved in running the North Hollywood hotel.
She was the honorary mayor of North Hollywood and served on the boards of the California Tourism Corp. and the Greater Los Angeles Visitors and Convention Bureau.
Alyssa Milano says Calif. stalker hiked to see her
LOS ANGELES - Actress Alyssa Milano has sought a temporary restraining order against a Northern California man who she says hiked miles to try to reach her.
A statement from Milano says the man has repeatedly tried to meet her and displayed increasingly threatening behavior. It also says he tried to gain access to an upcoming event where she is scheduled to appear.
Milano also is seeking protection for her parents and brother.
A hearing is scheduled for January.
Milano is best known for her roles on television series such as “Who’s the Boss?” and “Charmed.”
A statement from Milano says the man has repeatedly tried to meet her and displayed increasingly threatening behavior. It also says he tried to gain access to an upcoming event where she is scheduled to appear.
Milano also is seeking protection for her parents and brother.
A hearing is scheduled for January.
Milano is best known for her roles on television series such as “Who’s the Boss?” and “Charmed.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
